Has anyone here ever stepped back from writing and taken the time to explore writing techniques in general before continuing? I know I'm new at this but think examining the craft a bit more might help me a lot to further the writ.
-
Re: Study
Thu, April 12, 2007 - 6:46 PMMy reading for craft occurs on an ad hoc basis. When I find something that wows me, I scribble notes on why it blows me away and study the text more closely to try to figure out how it's done. For instance, the way Stephen Baxter manipulates time in _Evolution_, slowing down the asteroid impact that caused dinosaur extinctions, while at the same time preserving its fraction-of-a-second sensation. (That, plus some incredible prose and characterization of creatures who have no dialogue.)
I also loved Ursula Hegi's presentation of the craft (within a fictional setting) in her first novel, _Intrusions_. It's presented as a novel, not a primer, but it's got some great instructive material. I use it in my teaching, along with Naomi Epel's _The Observation Deck_, Natalie Goldberg's _Writing Down the Bones_, and other texts. -
-
Re: Study
Fri, April 13, 2007 - 3:57 PMI take the opposite tact. In other words, I note when something sucks, why I think it sucks, and then I try not to do that in the final draft...uh, if there is a final draft that is. If someone else thinks it sucks, I also try to take that into account too. Why? Because I find it easy to write in someone else's cadence but don't really want to...especially if that cadence sucks. Of course, too, the nutritional value of what I write is not all that great.
-
-
Re: Study
Tue, April 17, 2007 - 1:00 AMI have. Seven years' worth of craft and technique while getting my MFA in creative writing.
Important stuff, craft and technique.
But all the books on craft and all the study of technique don't hold a candle to the creation of your own words on a blank page and the labor of love in revising and rewriting those pages. -
-
Re: Study
Tue, April 17, 2007 - 4:46 AMI always like reading the interviews in the Paris Review.
And, then again, there's always theory.
And "theory light" - Milan Kundera's "The Curtain" just came out in English last month.
His "Art of the Novel" is pretty good, too. -
-
Re: Study
Fri, May 4, 2007 - 8:21 AMKundera can some times be out of my league. Not that I claim to be stupid, but his wealth of knowledge is astounding. It never fails that I'll start reading his work and end up studying something else in order to understand it. Ah well, since you've suggested it, I'll give it a go. -
-
Re: Study
Fri, June 1, 2007 - 8:17 AMYeah, but your question raises another more general one:
Do you need theory to write? -
-
Re: Study
Fri, June 1, 2007 - 10:32 AMYou don't, but I truly believe it can enhance the work. Why else eat the apple than to experience it? -
-
Re: Study
Sat, June 2, 2007 - 8:42 PMI seem to be learning the same lesson over and over again. In order for me to do some good writing, I have to have inspiration.
Technique may be great for a certain type of writing but getting the story out in a form that will make people want to read it, to me is the most important issue. -
-
Re: Study
Tue, June 5, 2007 - 12:55 PMAh, yes, inspiration.
Thank goodness for little boys.
-
-
-
-
-
-